Here’s a comparison to help illustrate what’s happening with students. Around the second or third grade, they learn to distinguish different monetary values. During this tender age, they learn, for example, that a dime is worth ten cents, a quarter is worth twenty-five cents, and a dollar bill is worth one hundred cents. After nailing down the basics, they then learn that if they stack a ten-dollar bill, a five-dollar bill, and four nickels together, they have fifteen dollars and twenty cents.
Intriguingly, they learned to differentiate units of money well before they possessed money. Why did they learn this skill so early? Because the skill of differentiating between monetary units is so essential that kids must learn it before participating in the economic world.
Unfortunately, such forethought was not put into the academic world. The ability to differentiate among thinking skills is a threshold skill. Students must possess this skill to do cognitively complex work. It is as indispensable to academics as differentiating among monetary units is to finances. Yet this skill isn’t usually taught.
Differentiating among thinking skills is essential to academic work because it enables students to do three critical regulatory functions:
- Figure out the cognitive performance requirements of academic tasks.
- Align their cognitive skills with the task requirements.
- Ensure that what they’ve learned matches what professors will assess.
Research suggests that students who lack this skill will waste time by shifting their effort in the wrong direction or studying for the wrong outcomes. Academic work is untenable when this skill is missing, and success is inconsistent.
Have you noticed that students may perform well on quizzes and low-stakes writing assignments, yet these same students fail tests and fall short on complex writing projects? Well, the likely reason is that the thinking requirements are qualitatively different. This problem can’t be solved by hard work. However, it can be solved by effective thinking. And it’s impossible for students to think effectively if they can’t differentiate among thinking skills.
I’ve created six metacognitive tools that have helped students differentiate among thinking skills. Here’s an introduction to three of these tools.
Tool 1: The ThinkWell-LearnWell Diagram
Help students become more attuned to the mental mechanisms that produce the correct
study outcomes. This tool empowers students to control their thinking.
Tool 2: The Outcome Decoder Tool
Help students figure out the language educators are using to communicate their cognitive standards. This tool equips students to align their thinking.
Tool 3: The Awareness and Optimization Activity
Help students become more sensitive to their past thinking and adjust for future success.
Using even one of these tools will put students on a path to take control of their academic performance. In the beginning, use these tools as external guides for students to map out their learning. The ultimate goal is for students to internalize these tools and use them as metacognitive metrics to gauge their thinking and learning. If you’re looking for “the one thing” that you can do that will give you the greatest return, then I suggest you use these tools to teach yourself, your student, your child, or anyone you care about to differentiate among thinking skills.
 Kelemen, W.L. (2000). Metamemory cues and monitoring accuracy: Judging what you know and what you will now. Journal of Educational Psychology 98(4) pp. 800 – 810.
Blog Post Feedback
In the next article, I will continue sharing how this skill changes the very essence of academic work by changing the quality metrics students use to judge their learning and knowledge.
Let’s chat. Leave a thoughtful comment below, and I’ll send you the following pdf version of this article. It’s a great conversation piece for faculty, staff, and students.